No idea what they are, except perhaps reflections of the can lights. Then also, the splotches in front of the stove are un-natural as well. There is no swimming pool in the kitchen! Still looks particularly bad in the stove hood, microwave, sink and faucets, there are areas of white spots, there are still "freckles" on some of the cabinetry near the stove plus scattered elsewhere, and the tile reflections are splotchy and completely un-natural appearing.as if off rippled water. I'd call it considerably WORSE than the prior renderings. It could not refer to the pixel by pixel method, because if you terminate that method early your image will have coarse pixels in some places, so it isn't a good image. That implies that the rendering was done by the progressive pass method. It seems that the pixel by pixel would be the "real" method, now that it is evidently working in the new version.īut, from the videos, comments were made as far as how long to let it go, with the diamond ring being left to go overnight (that was in the focused caustics video I believe). I don't know which is the preferred method. By contrast, the auto render seems to make progressive passes over the entire picture, something like the way a. The button renders by small pixel areas, apparently finishing with each one and moving to the next, pixel by pixel. There seems to be a difference in rendering. Reset for a lot fewer bounces, no focused caustics, and so forth, and it is much faster. Moving to the kitchen, I started it off with the same settings, but bailed on them when it became obvious that it was on-track for a 25 hour rendering time. I tend to doubt the 400x, and I doubt the 4x also. So it looks like the speed difference is somewhere between 4x and pending on what detail you concentrate on, and whether you believe it. Just taking 10 minutes, that suggests a speed difference of almost 75:1, which I have some trouble believing in. The 5 and 10 minute versions still don't seem to show the same level of "goodness". In other ways, the image is nowhere near as good even after 2 minutes, such as the vertical column reflections off the pulley, where the 2 minute version still has a lot of white dotting, and yours has a clean gradation. The reflections at the capacitor on top of the motor, for instance. In a lot of ways, the image is probably as good as yours between 30 sec and 1 min. (I do not know what the item labeled "attachments" is in the last post. There are postings that have gone ignored for months over there, and some of the more recent postings are from 2013 in certain areas. I did ask over at the Keyshot forum, but I don't expect much. What does it take to get a decent presentable image? I expected that 2 or 3 hours would make things better, but it has not really changed anything from what it looked like after 2 or 3 minutes. NO SIGN of the linear scratch pattern of brushing. It looks nothing like brushed stainless, it looks more like the fractured surface of cracked steel, or as if it had been sandblasted. And the gloss white cabinets show "freckles" of reflected light on them that consist of a bunch of white spots. The stove and dishwasher are better, but show white spots in areas instead of what presumably should be light reflection highlights. The attached (modified from prior images since the "client" made changes), has particularly crude rendering of the stock "light brushed stainless" in the sink, and not a lot better for the hood or the microwave. Some things quickly arrive at a good result, others show zero improvement after hours of undisturbed processing. I have been very unhappy with the Keyshot rendering quality on certain stock materials, and others that I tried to modify to improve them, as well. Obviously it DOES depend on the hardware, but in general should one expect several hours to not be enough?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |